Taylor: Death Comes for the Deconstructionist

June 17, 2021

Death Comes for the Deconstructionist
Daniel Taylor
(Cascade, 2014)
198 p.

First the Archbishop, and now this.

It’s an odd sort of murder mystery that Daniel Taylor has written. There’s a dead body, for sure — that of Richard Pratt, a fast-talking literature professor who falls from a hotel balcony with a Moby Dick-themed letter opener in his chest — and there is a detective — Jon Mote, a laconic, psychologically unstable and unmotivated former graduate student in Pratt’s department who gets hired as a PI by the dead man’s wife when the police investigation goes cold — and a Watson character — Jon’s mentally disabled sister Judy, who tags along with him as he meanders from interview to interview — and a constellation of possible suspects, as there must be. So far, so good.

But what is odd is how it plays out. Our detective isn’t really that interested in solving the mystery; he goes about it in fits and starts, out of a sense of obligation more than anything. He takes a lot of breaks. (I was envious!) Most of the time he’s more preoccupied with his own psychological, and, perhaps, spiritual health than in figuring out whodunit. There’s more than a dash of noir in the novel’s tone, as Jon drops wry and self-depreciating remarks the way Sam Spade dropped cigarette butts. I generally prefer my murder mystery detectives to have some personality, but here it’s more that a personality happens to have a mystery. I liked that about it.

Given that the detective is a former graduate student, and the stiff is a professor, there’s a good deal of dark academy humour in the book, and to my mind this is the best thing about it. As a campus comedy, it works very well. Pratt is a deconstructionist, which means, effectively, that he pours acid on things, and avoids pouring acid on his own self only insofar as he can maintain a mercurial, fleet-footed dance around his subject matter, one step ahead of his path of destruction. Taylor is really very good at satirizing this sort of thing — an easy target, maybe, but not one that I’ve often seen given the treatment, and it’s really funny.

The least successful aspect of the book, for me, was the sidekick character Judy. Conveying verbal mannerisms in print is no easy task, and I was never sure how she should sound. Perhaps I’m heartless, but she was for me an awkward presence that simply got on my nerves after a while.

As all mystery novels do, Death Comes for the Deconstructionist comes to some kind of conclusion about the death of its victim. And, as almost all mystery novels do, it fizzled in the process. It is because of this fizzling that my attitude towards the genre hovers somewhere between mild interest and active dislike, so maybe don’t listen to me. If you like this sort of book, you’ll probably like the ending better than I did. But I enjoyed getting there.

10 Responses to “Taylor: Death Comes for the Deconstructionist”

  1. Rob G Says:

    You have a similar take on mysteries to mine, which I guess is why I prefer procedurals to “puzzle” mysteries.

    As far as this book goes, I think that it’s more an academic satire written in the form of a mystery novel than a mystery proper, and perhaps from that angle we can give Taylor a little more slack in terms of the mystery element.


  2. Very nice blog.šŸ”„ šŸ¤‘ 2021-06-21 02h 03min

  3. Lexie Delone Says:

    Very nice blog.šŸ¤— šŸ¤  2021-06-21 02h 56min

  4. Yasmin Leavy Says:

    Very nice blog.šŸŒž šŸ¤— 2021-06-21 04h 00min

  5. Tim Rabassa Says:

    Very nice blog.šŸ˜ ā„ 2021-06-21 09h 12min


  6. Very nice blog.šŸ’„ ā„ 2021-06-21 09h 30min


  7. I loved this book, and especially loved Judy. I think I described it as a mystery written by Walker Percy.

    I’m also very fond of mysteries in general, but have never cared much about the puzzles as such, or made much effort to figure them out. Accordingly, though I more or less agree about the deficiencies of this book in that respect, I didn’t care. Atmosphere, characterization, and decent prose (preferably more than decent) are more important, but the fact that it’s a murder mystery means that the plot has a very definite shape, with a serious crime and its resolution at the heart of it, which provides a satisfaction that a vaguer narrative doesn’t unless it’s done at a very high literary level.

    • cburrell Says:

      I think it was your review that inspired me to add it to my queue. Thanks for that.

      On atmosphere, characterization, and prose I enjoyed the book a good deal. Often I care very little about plot in a story, but in a mystery the plot often seems to be the main point. Perhaps I got crushed in the space where the book’s literary ambitions pressed up against its genre conventions.

      I might add that you forgot to say, ‘Very nice blog’. šŸ˜Ž


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: