Welcome violations

May 18, 2010

An intriguing experimental result was announced today by the Fermilab particle accelerator.  I was going to sit down and write a layman’s account of what the finding indicates, but happily Stephen Barr has beat me to it.  He states it all quite clearly, and I recommend his article if you’re interested in these things.  My doctoral work was related to the physics under consideration in this experiment, so it is especially interesting for me to see this surprising result.

Essentially — glossing over all the details — they are claiming to have observed a physical process which, if confirmed, would indicate, really for the first time in decades, that the Standard Model of particle physics is incomplete.  (We know on other grounds that it is incomplete, but I believe that this would be the first time a laboratory experiment produced a result that was not consistent with the Standard Model and could not be fixed with a minor tweak.)  It would indicate that some new physics — a new force or new particles previously unknown — was being (indirectly) detected.

Barr makes two good points that I’ll re-iterate.  First, this experimental result could be a statistical fluctuation, and might go away as more data is collected; it does not yet meet the stringent standards for an official “discovery” in the particle physics community.  Second, the heavy breathing in the newspapers (such as in the NYT article linked above) about how this result explains “existence” is sheer puffery.  If it holds up it is certainly important, and it has implications for cosmology, but it is not metaphysical.  Obviously.

The official publication from Fermilab’s DØ experiment is here.  For a good one-slide summary of how this result compares to previous experimental results and the Standard Model expectation, look at slide 46 of this talk.

UPDATE: A kind reader, Vince, sends an update on this matter: another of the Fermilab experiments, CDF, has now published their measurement of the same quantity, with higher statistics, and they find it consistent with the Standard Model.  So it is likely that the DØ result will go away with more data. Too bad.  Thanks, Vince.

6 Responses to “Welcome violations”

  1. Quin Says:


    As an amateur philosopher I keep bumping up against a question … is math metaphysical? Speaking basically here. Why or why not?

    I understand this is only tangentially related to the post, but I need an answer. Fast!

    Kind regards,

  2. cburrell Says:

    The answer to your question is ‘yes’, but time constraints prevent me from providing conclusive arguments.

    • Quin Says:

      Thanks (I was just kidding about the “fast”, but man, it was!). I’ve become much more interested in math over the last few years – perhaps I should say “popular math books”, such as Struik’s History, Derbyshire’s on the Riemann Hypothesis, and another on the Euler constant.

      When I can, I like to use math as an illustration, or maybe a basic introduction to metaphysics. It seems to me that large swathes of the population are increasingly deaf to traditional metaphysical problems and arguments. Yet more and more people do have an inkling of mathematics (such as myself), so it makes sense to me to approach more traditional metaphysics through the medium of math.

  3. Vince (U of T classmate of Adam) Says:

    Looks like the anomaly can be ruled out.


  4. cburrell Says:

    Ah, thanks for that, Vince. Much appreciated. I will add an update to the original post.

  5. mady Says:

    your way of presenting the metaphysics is good. kindly give me more detail about math.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: