Goodman: The Killing of Julia Wallace

April 13, 2010

The Killing of Julia Wallace
Jonathan Goodman (Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969)
323 p. First reading.

Is there something morally suspect about the “true crime” genre?  I have sometimes thought so.  Taking an interest in the details of real-life murders seems akin to taking an interest in car accidents: one gazes with fascination at a scene of horror.  On the other hand, I have no such objections to murder mysteries and detective fiction, mostly, I believe, because their focus usually falls not on the crime, but on dispensing justice to the criminal.  Perhaps the same characteristic, when present, can redeem accounts of true crime as well.

Jonathan Goodman’s book falls on the fair side of the divide.  Of necessity it dwells at considerable length on the details of a murder, but all in the service of solving the case — something that had, until this book was written, proved elusive.

I am told that the Wallace case is one of the most famous in the annals of crime and detection.  The facts are briefly as follows: On the evening of 20 January 1931, Julia Wallace was brutally murdered in the sitting room of her home in Liverpool.  Her husband, William Herbert Wallace, was charged and convicted of the crime, but his conviction was overturned on grounds of insufficient evidence.  No-one else was ever charged.  Jonathan Goodman’s purpose in this book is to carefully review all of the available evidence.  In so doing, he convincingly exonerates Wallace, and proposes a compelling alternate theory of the murderer’s identity.

The circumstances surrounding the murder are worthy of a Hollywood thriller: a mysterious phone call, doors that seem to unlock themselves, a missing murder weapon, an apparent robbery, and — at least on the theory that Wallace committed the crime — a severely restricted time-frame.  Some have said that the case is remarkable principally because each piece of evidence can point two ways, either toward Wallace or away from him.  Goodman shows that this view of the case is false. It is true that much of the evidence has this quality, but some of it does not, and the latter category consistently points to Wallace’s innocence.  It was for this reason that it was suppressed by the police and the prosecution.

Indeed, maybe the most instructive thing about the Wallace case is how it illustrates the many ways in which a miscarriage of justice can occur.  The police immediately suspected Wallace of the murder, and did not seriously pursue other theories of the crime.  They botched their forensic analysis of the crime scene.  The prosecution did not call on witnesses whose testimony would have tended to exonerate Wallace.  Jurors were drawn from the Liverpool area where sensational rumours prejudicial to Wallace had been circulating, and the jury returned a guilty verdict — and a death sentence — with minimal deliberation.  As I said, this verdict was later overturned on appeal, not because of a technicality or because new evidence was presented, but simply because the available evidence failed to support the verdict — in other words, the jury was wrong.

At the end of the book Goodman presents an alternative theory of the murderer’s identity, and he may very well be right.  Certainly the case he makes is much stronger than that made against Wallace.  The Wikipedia page gives more details.

I first heard of Julia Wallace, and of this book, in the writings of Jacques Barzun.  I thank him, wherever he is, for introducing me to this very interesting case.

4 Responses to “Goodman: The Killing of Julia Wallace”

  1. John Gannon Says:

    Please read my new book concerning the case, ‘Julia Wallace and the Devil in the Detail” out in 2011 for major, new revalations –

    Warmest Regards

    John Gannon

    • Adrienne Says:

      Hi Mr. Gannon,

      For sometime I have been checking for and trying to track where I can purchase your book. This guy (attorney and true crime lover) I dated briefly–spoke a lot about this case–and I’ve wanted to read your perspective for some time. Robert’s email address is Mr.Qualtrough…–but wasn’t he imaginary? Anyway–your book was supposed to be released in 9/11 via Borders. Where can I get it? Many thanks, Adrienne

      • Anonymous Says:

        Hi Adrienne,
        Many thanks for your post. Your are quite correct – my book was due to be available on 1 Sept; unfortunatley, due to staff changes at Amberley Publishing this has been put back until December (just in time for Christmas). As soon as I have an exact date for this I will publish it on my website. Mr Qualtrough has, since the perpetration of this murder, been thought to have been a product of the telephone caller’s imagination. However, Mr Qualtrough did exist, his name being used by the telephone caller. As has always been said about this case “find Qualtrough (refering to the telephone caller), and you’ll find Julia’s killer” – you cannot know (until you read my book) how correct this assumption was.

        Warmest Regards

        John Gannon

  2. calumet0 Says:

    Dear Adrienne,

    Sorry had to leave the comment as ‘Anonymous’ – I attempted to log in and for the life of me I couldn’t remember my password!

    Warmest Regards

    John Gannon

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: